Lawyers for Sam Bankman-Fried want FBI special agents Luke Booth and Kristin Allain to testify in court tomorrow before the failed crypto tycoon takes the stand himself.

In the first preview of the defense's strategy after weeks with prosecutors at the helm of the ongoing criminal trial, lawyers for Bankman-Fried said they believe his former co-founder Gary Wang and head of engineering Nishad Singh testified inconsistently with what they earlier told the FBI. They want to include the original FBI interviews into evidence and also summon the agents to testify.

According to a letter sent to the judge on Wednesday, the defense argued that both Wang and Singh "denied having made or claimed not to recall having made the statements" recorded in earlier FBI interviews. They have both pleaded guilty to charges and have been cooperating with the government in its case against Bankman-Fried.

In one instance, the defense argued that Wang told the FBI that "the allow-negative flag was added to Alameda as part of their role as a market maker." In court, he said market making was not the only purpose of that feature. In several other instances, Wang and Nishad said in court they didn't remember saying the exact words from their FBI testimonies.

Wang, who is cooperating with the government, might be "pressured or incentivized to minimize an innocent explanation for special codebase features that benefited Alameda," which would be beneficial for Bankman-Fried, the lawyers say.

Hazy memories

As for Singh, he earlier told the FBI that his memories of the summer 2022, when he was sorting out Alameda Research's troubles, were "hazy." However, in court, he offered detailed recollection of the events, the lawyers said.

"Mr. Singh may feel obliged to support the Government’s narrative around events in June 2022, even though he had previously claimed to have a 'hazy' memory of that specific time period," the letter says.

Singh also seems to have changed his mind about buying a $3.7 million house in the Bahamas just weeks before FTX collapsed, which did not seem wrong to him at the time of the FBI testimony, according to the defense lawyers. In court, he described the purchase as "egregious, unnecessary, and selfish."

The lawyers believe these contradictions undermine Wang and Singh's credibility and support the notion that Bankman-Fried was acting in good faith when he allowed the special privileges for Alameda that have emerged as a centerpiece of the prosecution's case.